Donald Trump says US court ruling on tariffs was wrong, political; hopes Supreme Court reverses ‘horrible’ decision

By Admin

30 May, 2025

Former U.S. President Donald Trump has reignited the debate over presidential authority on tariffs, sharply criticizing a recent court decision that aimed to block some of the sweeping import duties imposed during his administration. In a fiery message posted on his social platform Truth Social, Trump called the ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade “so wrong” and “so political,” and expressed hope that the Supreme Court would swiftly overturn what he labeled a “horrible, Country threatening decision.”

The Legal Battle Over Tariffs

At the heart of the issue is a legal tug-of-war between the executive branch and the judiciary over the extent of presidential power on trade policy. The Manhattan-based U.S. Court of International Trade had recently ruled that Trump exceeded his authority in enforcing certain import tariffs, ordering an immediate halt to them.

However, the decision was promptly challenged. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington intervened by temporarily staying the lower court's order, effectively reinstating the tariffs while the appeal is under review. The appeals court has called for responses from the plaintiffs by June 5 and from the government by June 9.

Trump’s Response: "Horrific Decision"

Trump did not hold back his frustration. “The US Court of International Trade incredibly ruled against the United States of America on desperately needed Tariffs,” he wrote, accusing the three-judge panel of potentially acting out of personal or political bias. “Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of ‘TRUMP?’” he questioned.

He further criticized the process suggested by the ruling, which stated that the imposition of such tariffs should require congressional approval. Trump warned that such a requirement would render the presidency powerless in responding to unfair trade practices. “Hundreds of politicians would sit around DC for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion... This would completely destroy Presidential Power,” he declared.

Blame on Judicial Appointments

In an unexpected twist, Trump expressed regret over some of his own judicial appointments, stating, “I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations.” While he praised many of his picks, he emphasized that some decisions by these judges have had detrimental consequences for the nation.

Economic Stakes and National Sovereignty

Trump argued that the economic implications of the court ruling could be catastrophic. He said, “Under this decision, Trillions of Dollars would be lost by our Country... It would be the harshest financial ruling ever leveled on us as a Sovereign Nation.”

He reiterated his belief that tariffs are an essential tool for protecting the American economy, citing past successes: “It is only because of my successful use of Tariffs that many Trillions of Dollars have already begun pouring into the USA... It is the difference between having a rich, prosperous, and successful United States of America, and quite the opposite.”

Looking to the Supreme Court

With the stay from the appellate court now in place, the case appears headed toward a possible showdown in the Supreme Court. Trump concluded his remarks with a plea for judicial support, hoping for a decision that would reaffirm broad presidential powers to act swiftly and independently in matters of international trade.

As legal proceedings continue, this case will likely serve as a defining moment in clarifying the boundaries of executive authority in trade, as well as the broader political and economic landscape surrounding U.S. tariff policy.